• Skip to navigation (Press Enter).
  • Skip to main content (Press Enter).
  • English Version
  • Blog
  • Topics
  • Activities
  • Publications
  • Talks
  • Contact
  • Search

  • Twitter Updates

    • Categories

      • events (32)
        • CfP (6)
        • conference (18)
        • learntec (1)
        • symposium (7)
      • project (30)
        • agent-dysl (2)
        • mature-ip (16)
        • mirror (1)
        • myui (1)
        • soprano (8)
        • universaal (3)
      • publications (13)
      • tools (2)
        • mediawiki (1)
      • topics (56)
        • aal (10)
        • adaptivity (1)
        • competencies (15)
        • context (10)
        • education (3)
        • elearning (12)
        • hr (11)
        • km (12)
        • maturing (20)
        • microlearning (1)
        • motivation (2)
        • ontology (10)
        • project management (1)
        • workplace learning (17)
    • Archive

      • July 2010
      • May 2010
      • February 2010
      • January 2010
      • November 2009
      • September 2009
      • May 2009
      • March 2009
      • December 2008
      • November 2008
      • October 2008
      • September 2008
      • June 2008
      • May 2008
      • April 2008
      • March 2008
      • February 2008
      • January 2008
      • November 2007
      • October 2007
      • September 2007
      • August 2007
      • June 2007
      • May 2007
      • March 2007
      • February 2007
      • January 2007
      • December 2006
      • October 2006
      • September 2006
      • August 2006
    • RSS My MATURE Project blog

      • Professional Knowledge Management Conference 2011 in Innsbruck - From Knowlegde to Action
      • Knowledge Maturing in Europe - results of a large European study
      • People Tagging demonstrator evaluation - the "simplicity is fabulous"
      • Summary of demonstrators and motivational design approach
      • Successful second MATURE Review
      • Two Portuguese companies join the associate partner network
      • Knowledge Management 3.0 @ Learntec 2010
      • Continuous Competence Development: MATURE @ Professional Training Facts 2009
      • Third MATURE newsletter published
      • Promoting a shared understanding of competencies - position statement at IEEE LTSC WG20 meeting in Stuttgart
    • Tags

      aal competence elearning enterprise20 hr km knowledge_management learning matureip mirror-ip ontology reflection scohrid soprano web20 web30

    Archive for September, 2008

    WM2009 Workshop on Knowledge Services & Mashups (KSM09)

    Tuesday, September 30th, 2008

    http://ksm09.mature-ip.eu

    Part of the Conference on Professional Knowledge Management (WM 2009)

    Organizers & Contact

    • Tobias Ley, Know-Center, Graz, Austria
    • Stefanie Lindstaedt, Know-Center, Graz, Austria
    • Andreas Schmidt, FZI Research Center for Information Technologies, Karlsruhe, Germany

    Important Dates

    • October 31, 2008 Submission of workshop papers
    • December 15, 2008 Notification of authors about acceptance/rejection
    • January 10, 2009 Submission of camera-ready papers

    Endorsed by

    APOSDLE IP MATURE IP

    Introduction & Motivation

    Large monolithic knowledge management systems as the one-for-all KM solution have largely failed to live up to their expectations. In particular, they have failed

    • to integrate into work practices of the individual, thus lacking adoption by the individual
    • to adapt to different types and sizes of companies, different type of employees as well as changing requirements of those
    • to acknowledge that knowledge management is not an isolated activity within a company, but rather an activity of “networked individuals”

    In line with the trend towards modular service-oriented architectures, we can observe that knowledge management solutions increasingly adopt more modular approaches. However, these developments are usually merely a decomposition into software components without taking into account the user of such systems. But the notion of service goes beyond components; it usually assumes that the granularity of functionality as well as packaging is motivated by usage patterns (e.g., business processes) and not purely technical (software engineering) considerations.

    This means that the shift from integrated knowledge management solutions towards knowledge services is not only a question of modularity, but also requires rethinking offer and demand (by knowledge workers) of such services. And it also requires a thorough understand of knowledge work and new conceptual foundations for its support (e.g., the knowledge maturing model by Maier & Schmidt or the seeding-evolutionary growth-reseeding model by Fischer) to identify basic knowledge services and their interplay, which constitutes another issue of service-orientation: combination or orchestration of different services to provide higher-level functionality. That is the real power of service-oriented approaches.

    In the context of Web 2.0 (which in itself is a user-oriented approach to web applications where the social ecology is explicitly considered), the notion of mashups has emerged as an integration paradigm which is lightweight and easy such that:

    • end-users themselves can combine different services (like aggregating and filtering feeds of content, calendar information etc.)
    • applications and services can easily participate and offer those feeds

    This goes beyond service-orientation (which is about empowering the enterprise to creating their own solutions without relying on vendor prepackaging) and realizes end-user empowerment as well.

    A recent development in the related field of learning support is constituted by personal learning environments, replacing LMS similar to services and mashups replacing KMS. They envision a work environment of individual tools (e.g., for communication, sharing, awareness, collaboration, networking) that allow the individual for organizing her learning in a very personal way. They offer a construction set of small services to be configured by the individual user.

    The workshop aims at bringing these strands of development of service-oriented approaches to supporting knowledge management and learning together to go one step further beyond the enthusiasm about Knowledge Management 2.0, which is essentially about social software for knowledge management. The scope of the workshop ranges from theoretical and conceptual foundations (which might come from various disciplines), methodical contributions up to technical prototype development and gathering experiences from evaluations.

    • Theoretical and conceptual foundations of knowledge services and mash-ups
    • Notion of knowledge services and mashups
    • Theories and concepts of knowledge work
    • Requirements for knowledge services and mash-ups
  • Knowledge Service and Mashup engineering
    • for personal knowledge management and learning (including personal learning environments)
    • for supporting communities and social networking
    • for organizational knowledge management
  • Personalization and contextualization of services and mash-ups
    • Knowledge representations and models for services
    • Semantic models and metadata
  • Knowledge Service Architectures and integration concepts
    • Lightweight mash-up approaches to the combination of different knowledge services
    • Semantic service descriptions
    • Evaluation of knowledge services and mash-ups

    Submission Instructions

    All papers in the conference proceedings have to be formatted according to the following instructions under http://www.gi-ev.de/service/publikationen/lni/ (in German; Latex Template, Word Template). We solicit submissions of the following types:

    • Research papers
    • Case studies and experience reports from industry
    • Position papers and work-in-progress
    • Demonstrations

    Paper submissions should should not exceed 10 pages, descriptions of demos should not exceed 5 pages.

    For submissions, please use the electronic submission system under http://www.easychair.org/conferences/?conf=wm2009workshops and select the KSM workshop as track.

    Programme Committee

    Andreas Abecker, FZI Research Center for Information Technologies, Karlsruhe, Germany
    Steffen Lamparter, Karlsruhe Service Research Institute (KSRI), University of Karlsruhe, Germany
    Mathias Lux, University of Klagenfurt, Austria
    Johannes Magenheim, University of Paderborn (TBC)
    Ronald Maier, Leopold-Franzens-University of Innsbruck, Austria
    Gregoris Mentzas, National Technical University of Athens, Greece
    Claudia Müller, University of Stuttgart, Germany
    Sebastian Schaffert, Salzburg Research, Austria
    York Sure, SAP AG, Germany
    Robert Woitsch, BOC, Austria

    Posted in CfP | No Comments »

    ECTEL 2008 – "Time for Convergence" @ Maastricht

    Friday, September 19th, 2008

    This week I had the opportunity to attend the 3rd European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning at Maastricht in the Netherlands. It was a good networking opportunity for the TEL community, which some dubbed as a “big family” (with all the different aspects of a family). About 130 participants included mostly players from the European projects in the TEL area.

    There were some interesting key notes:

    • Kia Höök inspired the participants to consider the body and the affective dimension of human behavior in their research and development. I think that there is a huge potential, particularly if we want truly holistic and motivating/engaging learning experiences, although it is not easy to see how to transfer her research results, e.g., to workplace learning support. One step in that direction could be the upcoming Call 3 STREP xDELIA where my colleague Clemens van Dinther is involved in and which will deal with emotions.
    • Manu Kapur reported on his experiments on “productive failure”, which showed that students who fail in groups confronted with ill-structured problems outperform those who are successful in groups with well-structured problems even in well-structured problem domains. This implies that short-term failure may not be a reliable indicator for longer term learning success.

    ECTEL08 has given itself the mission “Time of convergence”, aiming at bridging different learning contexts. The discussions at the conference showed that convergence it still at its beginning. This manifested in the recurring debates about the role of informal learning and whether the TEL community should target that more (as APOSDLE and MATURE have started):

    • There was an increasing number of presentations and discussion contributions (e.g, from Graham Attwell as part of the MATURE PLE conceptualizations), including the keynote by Roy Pea who emphasized the role of informal learning compared to formal learning (e.g., only 5% of a student’s learning is within formal contexts).
    • On the other side, Pierre Dillenbourg doubted that this turn towards the “informal” is helpful for the TEL community (he still acknowledges the importance of informal learning) and suspects that this emerging shift of attention is because of frustration about not being able to change the formal system.
    • Rob Koper emphasized in the closing panel that if we want to have informal learning support, we should first work on the acknowledgment and valuing of informal activities in career development.

    The EC (represented by Pat Manson, Marco Marsella, and Martin Májek) explained that investments into TEL have so far not entered practice in a sufficient way. Stefanie Lindstaedt pointed out that industry could be faster to introduce workplace learning tools, but for that we need to provide evidence about the impact, and this can only be achieved if we do not focus on short term effects, but also on longer term effects.

    Also for MATURE, this was a good event. On the first day, MATURE presented the first results of the five months of the project and organized a workshop on Learning in Enterprise 2.0. This was a very good opportunity to bring together the different strands of development (ethnography, concept development, and technical integration of existing tools within design studies) in an open atmosphere and to receive feedback from the community. Additionally, Graham Attwell presented the rolling out of a first simple PLE based on Freefolio in the UK, which is closely linked to MATURE activities.

    Technorati tags: ectel08, matureip

    Posted in conference, elearning, mature-ip, publications, workplace learning | No Comments »

    Learning in Enterprise 2.0 Workshop and first MATURE results

    Tuesday, September 9th, 2008

    Next week, I will attend the ECTEL 2008 conference at Maastricht. Together with several others I am organizing the LEB 2008 workshop (Learning in Enterprise 2.0 and Beyond), which aims at exploring the implications of web 2.0 and e-learning 2.0 to learning in enterprises. This will also be a good opportunity to see the results of the first five months of the MATURE IP and to get into discussion with us:

    • Informal learner styles: Individuation, interaction, in-form-ation (Ronald Maier, Stefan Thalmann)
      This contributions presents an informal learning typology based on the first ethnographic study.
    • Concept of a Tool Wrapper Infrastructure for Supporting Services in a PLE (Tobias Nelkner, Wolfgang Reinhardt, Graham Attwell)
      The authors present further steps towards the notion of a personal learning environment in enterprises.
    • Ontologies, Dialogue and Knowledge Maturing: Towards a Mashup and Design Study (Andrew Ravenscroft, Simone Braun, John Cook, Andreas Schmidt, Jenny Bimrose, Alan Brown, Claire Bradley)
      This contribution introduces a design study of combining the SOBOLEO tool for supporting ontology maturing and the Interloc tool for argument games.

    Technorati tags: matureip, ectel08

    Posted in conference, elearning, mature-ip, maturing, workplace learning | No Comments »

    E-mail:  email address Contact information
    Copyright © 2010, Andreas Schmidt.