• Skip to navigation (Press Enter).
  • Skip to main content (Press Enter).
  • English Version
  • Blog
  • Topics
  • Activities
  • Publications
  • Talks
  • Contact
  • Search

  • Twitter Updates

    • Categories

      • events (35)
        • CfP (6)
        • conference (21)
        • learntec (1)
        • symposium (7)
      • project (35)
        • agent-dysl (2)
        • mature-ip (20)
        • mirror (3)
        • myui (2)
        • soprano (8)
        • universaal (4)
      • publications (13)
      • tools (2)
        • mediawiki (1)
      • topics (61)
        • aal (10)
        • adaptivity (1)
        • affective (1)
        • competencies (15)
        • context (12)
        • education (3)
        • elearning (14)
        • hr (11)
        • km (15)
        • maturing (22)
        • microlearning (1)
        • motivation (4)
        • ontology (10)
        • project management (1)
        • workplace learning (21)
    • Archive

      • March 2012
      • February 2012
      • February 2011
      • November 2010
      • October 2010
      • September 2010
      • July 2010
      • May 2010
      • February 2010
      • January 2010
      • November 2009
      • September 2009
      • May 2009
      • March 2009
      • December 2008
      • November 2008
      • October 2008
      • September 2008
      • June 2008
      • May 2008
      • April 2008
      • March 2008
      • February 2008
      • January 2008
      • November 2007
      • October 2007
      • September 2007
      • August 2007
      • June 2007
      • May 2007
      • March 2007
      • February 2007
      • January 2007
      • December 2006
      • October 2006
      • September 2006
      • August 2006
    • RSS My MATURE Project blog

      • People Tagging Tool / SOBOLEO release as open source
      • "A refreshing new perspective on learning": MATURE raises interest at Learntec 2012
      • knowledge-maturing.com launched for releasing MATURE results
      • New Flyer on Knowledge Maturing Model
      • Two journal articles accepted
      • STELLAR Roundtable on Social Mobile Networking for Informal Learning (SoMobNet)
      • Knowledge Maturing for Organizational Development: A Workshop with IFIP
      • MATURE at WikiSym 2011
      • MATURE and competence development: Professional Training Facts 2011
      • 2nd Workshop on Motivational and Affective Aspects in TEL
    • Tags

      aal competence ectel10 elearning enterprise20 hr km knowledge_management learning matureip mirror-ip ontology pwm2011 reflection scohrid soprano web20 web30

    Archive for February, 2008

    Good Tags – Bad Tags: Social Tagging in Knowledge Organization

    Monday, February 25th, 2008

    Tagging as a lightweight, more participatory approach to resource metadata has become a hype in a wide range of disciplines, among them computer science, information management, and psychology. Last week’s workshop “Good Tags – Bad Tags: Social Tagging in Knowledge Organization”, well organized at Tübingen at the Knowledge Media Research Center, showed the different, but converging perspectives on tagging. Main success factors identified were:

    • simplicity (and the resulting ease of use), although a “tagging competency” was still considered necessary
    • enabling of participatory system design (i.e., tagging as appropriate metadata formalism for user generated content)
    • reduction of cognitive load for the annotator
    • flexibility and agility (not prescribing metadata structure, but allowing for emergence thereof)

    The workshop also showed different understanding of “tags” and “tagging”. Johannes Busse (a colleague from ontoprise working in our project Im Wissensnetz made a good point with differentiating between linguistic tagging (where a tag represents a syntactic string) and semantic tagging (where a tag is another resource, be it a semantic concept, a person, another resource etc.). Also, some definitions of a tag annotation were presented, which stressed that a tag annotation is basically a triple (resource, tag, user) with several other attributes (e.g., timestamp, but also additional semantic qualifiers).

    While tagging is a challenge for controlled vocabularies like library thesauri, it should be clear that controlled vocabularies and ontologies have their clear benefits in terms of disambiguation, multilinguality, levels of abstraction, and simple typos. So our contribution on ontology maturing, from simple tags to full-fledged ontologies actually showed the way: leverage on the simplicity of tagging for broadening the group of users contributing to the metadata generating, while retaining the possibility of higher-quality metadata. Interesting lightweight developments in that respect was the approach on Semantic Weblog by Benjamin Birkenhage.

    Posted in maturing, ontology, symposium | Comments Off

    First German Ambient Assisted Living (AAL) Congress 2008

    Friday, February 1st, 2008

    SOPRANO AAL 2008 PosterThe last three days I was at the first German AAL Congress at Berlin and presented (together with my colleague Christophe Kunze) our results in the area of context-aware technologies for ambient assisted living. This encompassed intelligent sensor systems for detecting activities and other vital parameters, our ontology-centered design methodology as well as our AAL ontology from our work in SOPRANO. I had some interesting discussions with a lot of interesting people ;)

    The congress had 330 participants on the first two days alone (and they had to close registration early in January) Demographic change was the stereotypical motivation slide… And the dominating discussion theme of the German-speaking part was the lack of business models, which was seen as a main cause for the lack of market take-up. Closer inspection revealed that the majority of problems probably is due to regulatory conditions, especially in the area of health and care insurance. This is supposed to change with the new financial system of the health insurance in Germany, starting 2009 where a lot of interesting things are expected to happen. Let’s see if this helps to reduce barriers.

    The European day was dominated by the new Joint AAL Programme under Article 169, which is supposed to introduce a new funding programme that is aimed at more short-term projects (2-3 years time-to-market). The first call will be published end of March/beginning of April. Available funding does not appear to be extremely high – so the call will probably be highly competetive. Expected consortia are about the size of FP7 STREPs. The proposals will be evaluated centrally (at an European level), however, the funding contracts will be made with the national authorities. Although it was claimed that the funding regulations are making it easier to participate, especially for SMEs, because of the national funding agencies, I believe this introduces additional complexity (while FP7 rules are – also for SMEs – quite simple if they have some consulting on it). The national authorities have budget limits so that situations may arise where a consortium is recommended for funding while the national funding agency does not have any money left… Probably, also with decentralized reporting, you will generate additional overhead.

    The emerging AAL community appears to be an interesting mix of various disciplines with surprisingly concrete visions and a challenging field for applied research where technology can achieve much – but only if it is embedded in a holistic solution.

    Posted in aal, conference, ontology, soprano | Comments Off

    E-mail:  email address Contact information
    Copyright © 2010, Andreas Schmidt.